Worthog117

The musings of a Rabid, British Wolf

798 notes

afkdogisonfire:

ciscrimes:

This is awesome. Look at the look on the guy’s face… he can’t even bring himself to look at those “subhuman” LGBT*QIA people. Fucking asshole. It’s fucking disgusting what it happening in Russia at the moment and I can only commend these brave activists for risking their own safety by protesting the injustices that are happening parralel to these Olympics!

THIS JUST IN!!! MAN OPPRESSES HOMOSEXUALS FOR NOT LOOKING AT FLAG AND GOING ON WITH HIS DAY! NEWS AT 11.

afkdogisonfire:

ciscrimes:

This is awesome. Look at the look on the guy’s face… he can’t even bring himself to look at those “subhuman” LGBT*QIA people. Fucking asshole. It’s fucking disgusting what it happening in Russia at the moment and I can only commend these brave activists for risking their own safety by protesting the injustices that are happening parralel to these Olympics!

THIS JUST IN!!! MAN OPPRESSES HOMOSEXUALS FOR NOT LOOKING AT FLAG AND GOING ON WITH HIS DAY! NEWS AT 11.

(via demisnowflake)

41,861 notes

whythatsbullshit:

theonemrfoster:

lightskinjeezus:

caramelblackness:

strawberricurls:


"7 Year Old Girl Sent Home In Tears Because Her Natural Hair Is Against School Policy"The Deborah Brown Community School’s policy against “faddish” hair — “such as dreadlocks, afros, mohawks” — led to a 7-year-old girl being sent home from school in tears. Tiana Parker’s father, Terrance Parker, told KOKI that he was forced to pull his daughter out of the Tulsa charter school after administrators hassled the family about her appearance. Parker, who’s a barber, said school officials at Deborah Brown told him that Tiana’s hair didn’t look presentable.Tiana, a straight A student, wears a different school uniform now, but the same hair style, which looks perfectly fine according to her new school.The school’s dress code states “hairstyles such as dreadlocks, afros, mohawks, and other faddish styles are unacceptable.”Read the rest here (http://wp.me/p1XSAA-1hW)The Schools Facebook page :https://www.facebook.com/DeborahBrownCommunitySchoolTulsaOk


This pisses me off!!! Why the hell are dreadlocks and afros even considered “faddish hair”?!?!?!? A mohawk, I can understand, but you’re telling our girls that wearing their hair THE WAY IT GROWS OUT OF THEIR HEADS IS UNACCEPTABLE… I’m so done with this shit!! I hope her parents fight this, for real.

Notice how they banned primarily black hairstyles.

They banned all PoC hairstyles. Why? Because WHITE PEOPLE.
White people take our shit, turn it into fads and “fashion statements” - see dreadlocks and mohawks - and then ridicule the originators for sporting our own shit - see our ENTIRE FUCKING LIVES.
I hope this little girl’s parents sue the school into a hole in prehistoric Europe.

Yeah! FUCKING WHITE PEOPLE!!! How dare those white people in charge…
oh…
oh wait…


rekt

whythatsbullshit:

theonemrfoster:

lightskinjeezus:

caramelblackness:

strawberricurls:

"7 Year Old Girl Sent Home In Tears Because Her Natural Hair Is Against School Policy"

The Deborah Brown Community School’s policy against “faddish” hair — “such as dreadlocks, afros, mohawks” — led to a 7-year-old girl being sent home from school in tears. Tiana Parker’s father, Terrance Parker, told KOKI that he was forced to pull his daughter out of the Tulsa charter school after administrators hassled the family about her appearance. Parker, who’s a barber, said school officials at Deborah Brown told him that Tiana’s hair didn’t look presentable.

Tiana, a straight A student, wears a different school uniform now, but the same hair style, which looks perfectly fine according to her new school.

The school’s dress code states “hairstyles such as dreadlocks, afros, mohawks, and other faddish styles are unacceptable.”

Read the rest here (http://wp.me/p1XSAA-1hW)

The Schools Facebook page :https://www.facebook.com/DeborahBrownCommunitySchoolTulsaOk

This pisses me off!!! Why the hell are dreadlocks and afros even considered “faddish hair”?!?!?!? A mohawk, I can understand, but you’re telling our girls that wearing their hair THE WAY IT GROWS OUT OF THEIR HEADS IS UNACCEPTABLE… I’m so done with this shit!! I hope her parents fight this, for real.

Notice how they banned primarily black hairstyles.

They banned all PoC hairstyles. Why? Because WHITE PEOPLE.

White people take our shit, turn it into fads and “fashion statements” - see dreadlocks and mohawks - and then ridicule the originators for sporting our own shit - see our ENTIRE FUCKING LIVES.

I hope this little girl’s parents sue the school into a hole in prehistoric Europe.

Yeah! FUCKING WHITE PEOPLE!!! How dare those white people in charge…

oh…

oh wait…

rekt

(via demisnowflake)

10 notes

Anonymous asked: "Its funny isn’t it? When did angsty teenagers start raging FOR the machine?". A good question, alot of these snowflakes are sort of what Frederic Bastiat described in the socialists of his day. They think that the law ought to be used to protect their fragile feelings and force others to live in a certain manner. I say the prevalence in leftist thought is no coincidence. Leftism is all about state control over the individual. It's hip to be leftist in this day and age.

neonationalist:

And its hilarious that they keep cheering for this fantasy government of theirs because the reality is quite far from that.  But hey, let them lobby for their own mass graves I say. .

image

Indeed. There is a very credible correlation to the size of the state, and the state of individual liberty within a country. By screaming for more government they’re screaming to have a noose placed on their collective necks. As the NSA shit as shown, it’s naive to believe that the state will always work in it’s citizens interests, and they want to diminish what power the citizens have over the government with their war on guns!

Filed under USLiberalism 'Progressivism' TheStateIsNotYourFriend

599 notes

archangellesnowflake:

admiralangryaardvark:

thisisableism:

ughsocialjustice:


wtf this isn’t oppression of disabled people, this is literally the company trying to make sure that people aren’t killed or seriously maimed.
SJWs…*shakes head*

This is the dumbest fucking post I have ever seen. -the brown one

Perhaps if you’re not disabled yourself then you shouldn’t be commenting on such subjects. It’s never particularly wise to trust people who pretend to be an authority on an issue they are uneducated in. Have some gall and reblog posts from the users you feel like harassing. Don’t screenshot them so that you don’t have to deal with a response.

Perhaps if you don’t own a parasailing company you shouldn’t be commenting on such subjects. It’s never particularly wise to trust people who pretend to be an authority on an issue they are uneducated in.Regulations exist to protect both the individual and the company.  If you’ll notice the wording used is “we do not suggest” not “we forbid you”. Congrats, on solid use of your jump to conclusions mat.

"We don’t recommend you participate in this activity if you have a preexisting spinal injury/condition, as it might make it worse"
"THIS IS DISCRIMINATION, WHY DO YOU HATE THE DISABLED?!"
God… I doubt they are only advising certain people against participating in such an activity because of discrimination. Maybe they know that the particular activity has an increased risk of injury for people with certain conditions, may lead to potentially worsening of an injury, leaving people without options of compensation because of liability waivers? Just a wild concept…

archangellesnowflake:

admiralangryaardvark:

thisisableism:

ughsocialjustice:

wtf this isn’t oppression of disabled people, this is literally the company trying to make sure that people aren’t killed or seriously maimed.

SJWs…*shakes head*

This is the dumbest fucking post I have ever seen. 
-the brown one

Perhaps if you’re not disabled yourself then you shouldn’t be commenting on such subjects. It’s never particularly wise to trust people who pretend to be an authority on an issue they are uneducated in. Have some gall and reblog posts from the users you feel like harassing. Don’t screenshot them so that you don’t have to deal with a response.

Perhaps if you don’t own a parasailing company you shouldn’t be commenting on such subjects. It’s never particularly wise to trust people who pretend to be an authority on an issue they are uneducated in.

Regulations exist to protect both the individual and the company.  If you’ll notice the wording used is “we do not suggest” not “we forbid you”. Congrats, on solid use of your jump to conclusions mat.

"We don’t recommend you participate in this activity if you have a preexisting spinal injury/condition, as it might make it worse"

"THIS IS DISCRIMINATION, WHY DO YOU HATE THE DISABLED?!"

God… I doubt they are only advising certain people against participating in such an activity because of discrimination. Maybe they know that the particular activity has an increased risk of injury for people with certain conditions, may lead to potentially worsening of an injury, leaving people without options of compensation because of liability waivers? Just a wild concept…

(via demisnowflake)

4,147 notes

Anonymous asked: Even if we were to agree bad is a problematic word, how the hell do you replace a word so fundamentally basic and all-encompassing? Are we supposed to use newspeak and replace "bad" with "ungood"?

archangellesnowflake:

kevintranismyking:

examage:

archangellesnowflake:

peori:

sara-jane-wanker:

manwhospeaks:

commanderabutt:

fucknointernetignorance:

commanderabutt:

watchoutboy:

demisnowflake:

No, because good stems from the Old English ‘god’

This is offensive to atheists and those with polytheist beliefs. As such, it’s as offensive as b*d.

Therefore, in place of g**d and b*d, you should use ‘progressive’ and ‘problematic’ respectively. k thx.

excuse me, the word pro*****ive is problematic to those who cannot progress, and is an ableist slur. please arrange to have this fixed immediately.

please stop using the word slur as it reminds me i do not have a slurpee 

the word slurpee reminds me of cold things and i have a phobia of the cold wow screw you matt
-Kevin

you frost giant hating racist bitch

Giant is incredible offensive to really tall people, you heightist shitlord!

Exuse me could we stop using the word offensive it is very triggering to those of us who have been or are currently offended by something.

*** ********* **** ***** **** ** * ****** ******* ** *** ********* ********* ********* ** ****** **, *****?

OMG THIS^^^^

My grandfather was killed by asterisks in the war you sick son of a bitch! Use a non-triggering symbol!

yall need to shut the fuck up and stop making up fake shit to make fun of social justice bloggers

You may be right, they are perfectly capable of making themselves look like big dumb idiots without anyone’s help.

http://archangellesnowflake.tumblr.com/post/71121864455

But on second thought, GO FIST YOURSELF, because I do what I want. (◡‿◡✿) uwu ^_^

228 notes

Anonymous asked: Just an example of male privilege- my boss left for the day and put my male coworker in charge even though I'm a better worker. My male coworker then left to "run errands", putting me in charge but not giving me any credit. He then proceeded to return to the office every few hours to see if I had messed up yet. The funny thing is, I did everything right, so I told him and he said "You haven't messed up yet, but you will." i can't even. RAGE.

clayphoenix:

misandry-mermaid:

I hope you told your boss what happened.  Always report these kinds of things and keep documentation of EVERYTHING you can.

i feel like this was an episode of spongebob

358 notes

Reblog to end cis white prejudice!

ciswhitepride:

This blog exists to combat the amount of unprovoked and startling hatred for cis white men & women among the supposed social justice contingent on many popular websites. As a majorly unrepresented group, we as everyday people feel that we should have a voice as well. Reblog, visit our page, ask a question or share your thoughts!